Legal Opinion
Speedy Messenger & Delivery Service v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 29, 2005No. 04CA2689PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by:
Judge RUSSEL.
Petitioner, Speedy Messenger & Delivery Service (Speedy), seeks review of an order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel). We affirm.
I. Procedural History
In 2003, the Division of Employment determined that Speedy was required to pay unemployment compensation taxes as an employer of certain couriers. Speedy protested, and the matter was referred to a hearing officer.
In August 2004, the hearing officer affirmed the division’s determination. The officer first examined a written contract that purported to define the relationship between Speedy and the couriers. He…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carpet Exchange of Denver, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Locke v. LongacreColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- Barge v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Home Health Care Professionals v. Colorado Department of Labor & Employment, Division of EmploymentColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Pero v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- SZL, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. Softrock Geological Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- Long View Systems Corp. USA v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Softrock Geological Services, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.