Carpet Exchange of Denver, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HUME.
Carpet Exchange of Denver, Inc., seeks review of the final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel, which ruled that workers who installed floor covering pur*281chased by the company’s customers were in employment covered by the Colorado Employment Security Act, § 8-70-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 3B). We affirm the order in part and set it aside in part.
Under § 8-70-115(l)(b), C.R.S. (1992 Cum.Supp.), an employment relationship is presumed whenever one person performs services for another. This presumption can be rebutted if the putative employer proves both of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Industrial Commission v. BonfilsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Allen Co., Inc. v. INDUSTRIAL COM'NSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Arnold v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Locke v. LongacreColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. BergerudSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Fleece on Earth v. Dept. of Employment and TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- Thornbury v. AllenColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- SZL, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.