Legal Opinion

Cox v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 19, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNally, J.

Plaintiffs, electors of the City of New York, challenge as unconstitutional various statutes implementing the establishment of the city-wide court of civil jurisdiction. Defendants are the City Clerk and the Commissioner of Elections, constituting the Board of Elections in the City of New York.

The statutory provisions for the election of the Judges are allegedly violative of the New York State Constitution because of noncompliance with the provision for their election “ by the electors of the counties included within the city of New York from districts within such counties established by law…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. WRIGHT Et Al. v. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. People v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. New York State Ass'n of Trial Lawyers v. RockefellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. Mann v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1965
  5. Kail v. RockefellerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dorfman v. BermanNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Matter of Moody v. New York State Bd. of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API