Cryder v. Garrison
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Jones,
This appeal is concerned ivith the interpretation of a lvill. As in many of such cases, no difference of opinion is admissible with respect to the germane rules of construction. It is only a matter of their relative applicability. The basic question involved is whether a specific devise of the testatrix’s “home” property to “three nieces”, appositely named, was a devise to them individually or as a class. One of the nieces having predeceased the testatrix, residuary legatees and the decedent’s executors asserted that the specific devise lapsed to the extent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lifter EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Long's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Billings's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Yarnall EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Buzby EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Soles EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Friedman v. HannanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- In Re Estate of ClarkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Cryder v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Pickering EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Bucks County · 1958