Legal Opinion

Cryder v. Garrison

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1957No. Appeal, 237PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones,

This appeal is concerned ivith the interpretation of a lvill. As in many of such cases, no difference of opinion is admissible with respect to the germane rules of construction. It is only a matter of their relative applicability. The basic question involved is whether a specific devise of the testatrix’s “home” property to “three nieces”, appositely named, was a devise to them individually or as a class. One of the nieces having predeceased the testatrix, residuary legatees and the decedent’s executors asserted that the specific devise lapsed to the extent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lifter EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Long's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Billings's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Yarnall EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Buzby EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Soles EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Friedman v. HannanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. In Re Estate of ClarkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Cryder v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Pickering EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Bucks County · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API