Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Hannan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 14, 2010No. 3 September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

In this case we interpret Section 4-105(4) of Md.Code (1974, 2001 ReplVol.) Estates & Trusts Article (“ET”), which directs that , provisions in a will “relating to the spouse” be revoked upon divorce from that person. We hold that the automatic revocation provision of ET Section 4-105(4) is not limited to bequests to a former spouse, and may include bequests to a former spouse’s family members. A court should utilize the terms of the will and circumstances surrounding its execution to determine whether a bequest “relat[es] to the spouse” within the meaning of Section 4-105(4),

On…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Clancy v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Southeast Alabama Medical Center v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. Ryan v. ThurstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Tayloe v. MosherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Peters v. Early Healthcare Giver, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Stacey J. Cordell v. Cleveland Tennessee Hospital, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
  3. Vito v. GrueffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. State v. Neiswanger Mgmt. Servs., LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. State v. RayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API