Legal Opinion

Watson v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 10, 1941No. 13824PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. It is declared in the Code, § 26-6201, that, “Whoever shall solicit another for the purpose of prostitution or shall solicit for a prostitute, or who shall offer to procure a prostitute for another, or shall, with knowledge or good reason to know of the immoral purpose of such directing, taking or transporting, direct or assist in directing, or shall take or transport, assist in taking or transporting, or offer or agree to take or transport, on foot, or by automobile, or any other means, any person to any house of ill fame, hotel, rooming-house, apartment, room, park, field…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Herndon v. LowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Cline v. Frink Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Gaines v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API