Legal Opinion
State v. Abdullah
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided January 12, 2004No. 3721PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KITTREDGE, J.:
Muttaquin Abdullah was indicted for possession with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijuana within a one-half mile proximity of a school. In pre-trial proceedings, Abdullah moved to suppress evidence seized in a warrantless search, contending that the search and seizure violated the Fourth Amendment. The circuit court granted the motion to suppress. The State appeals, claiming the circuit court erred in finding a Fourth Amendment violation of Adbullah’s rights. 1 We reverse.
FACTS
Shortly before 1:00 a.m. on October 4, 2000, two officers…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- State v. LylesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- State v. MartucciCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- State v. PreslarCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.