Countess v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
September Term, 1979.]
1ConcurrenceDavidson, J.
I agree with the majority’s holding that under Rule 735 d, the election of a court trial is not effective unless there is an affirmative showing on the record that the defendant himself has asserted that “he has the right to be tried by a jury of *46512 persons or by the court without a jury; that whether trial is by a jury or by the court, Ms guilt must be found to be beyond a reasonable doubt; and that in a jury trial all 12 jurors must agree that he is so guilty but in a court trial the, judge may so find.” I therefore concur that on the facts of the cases before us, there was not compliance…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. MurrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.