Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Countess v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 10, 1979No. [No. 36, September Term, 1979.] [No. 49, September Term, 1979.]Published

September Term, 1979.]

1ConcurrenceDavidson, J.

I agree with the majority’s holding that under Rule 735 d, the election of a court trial is not effective unless there is an affirmative showing on the record that the defendant himself has asserted that “he has the right to be tried by a jury of *46512 persons or by the court without a jury; that whether trial is by a jury or by the court, Ms guilt must be found to be beyond a reasonable doubt; and that in a jury trial all 12 jurors must agree that he is so guilty but in a court trial the, judge may so find.” I therefore concur that on the facts of the cases before us, there was not compliance…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. MurrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API