Legal Opinion

United States v. Hacker

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 13, 2009No. 08-2427PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Scott Hacker challenges the district court’s 1 denial of his motion to dismiss an indictment charging him with failing to register as a sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 16901-16991. We have jurisdiction over this appeal from 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because the district court did not err by denying Hacker’s motion, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The material facts are undisputed. In 1995, Hacker was convicted in Texas of aggravated sexual assault of a child, a first-degree felony, for which he…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Hohn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Iowa League of Cities v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Paul ShenandoahCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. UteschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API