Legal Opinion
Kahin v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 2, 2000No. 3:99-cv-01903PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JONES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant United States of America’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff Mohamed Kahin’s request for judicial review of an administrative action permanently disqualifying his store from participation in the Food Stamp Program. Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant maintains that no dispute of material fact exists as to Plaintiffs alleged violations of the Food Stamp Program rules. FED. R. CIV. P. 56. For the reasons set forth below, the Court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Del P. Henry, Jr., a Single Man, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Gill Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Kim v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Plaid Pantry Stores, Inc., Dba Plaid Pantry Store No. 65 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Duchimaza v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Idias v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Young Choi Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2009
- Idias v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- McClain's Market v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.