Legal Opinion

Bibby v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 1922No. Civ. No. 4228PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendants to recover damages for injuries caused by a collision which occurred between the hotel bus owned and operated by the defendant Dimmiek and an interurban ear owned and operated by the defendant Pacific Electric Railway Company. The plaintiffs had judgment against the defendant Dimmiek and that defendant has appealed.

The plaintiffs are husband and wife. In their complaint they charge negligence against the owner of the bus and against the street-car company. The latter filed an answer in which it denied that it was negligent and pleaded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Loftus v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Blackwell v. American Film Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kaley v. HuntleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Commonwealth v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth Insurance of New York v. Riverside-Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Haber v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Aungst v. Central California Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API