Staub v. Hy-Vee, Inc.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TAMARA STAUB, ) ) v. ) Case No. 19-cv-4249-JES-JEH ) HY-VEE, INC., ) ORDER AND OPINION This matter is now before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Hy-Vee, Inc. (Doc. 20). Plaintiff Tamara Staub has filed a Response (Doc. 22) and Defendant has filed a Reply (Doc. 25). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion (Doc. 20) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. PROCEDURAL HISTORY The female Plaintiff Tamara Staub was employed by Hy-Vee, Inc., for 22 years, having most recently worked at the store located at…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.