Legal Opinion

Williams v. Penick-Hughes Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 1931No. 12407PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

Penick-Hughes Company, a corporation, sued L. Garrison, G. C. Hollis, both of whom were alleged to reside in the state of Oklahoma, and Curg Williams, alleged to reside in Gray county, Tex., doing business in the name of City Tinners & Plumbers at Plollis, Olcl. Plaintiff alleged that on or about June 10, 1926, for a valuable consideration, the defendants delivered to plaintiff one certain promissory note, dated June 10, 1925, in the sum of $463. That said note was entitled to a credit of $45, paid March 24, 1927. That said note was now past due • and unpaid; and that defendants were partners…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. BlackwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Robinson v. First Natinal BankTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. R. G. Andrews Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1918
  4. Rodgers-Wade Furniture Co. v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Green v. EnenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wald Transfer & Storage Co. v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API