Legal Opinion

Robinson v. First Natinal Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1904No. 1352PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Cooke County. The Bank sued Robinson and Hoskins with others, and had judgment against them, which was affirmed on their appeal, whereupon appellants obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by defendant in error against J. H. Robinson, W. A. Hoskins, B. F. Pierce and J. A. Saxon to recover a promissory note signed in the name of Saxon, Pierce & Co., and by Pierce and Saxon individually. The parties defendant were alleged to be a partnership doing business under the name of Saxon, Pierce & Co. Robinson and Hoskins pleaded under oath denying the alleged partnership. Saxon and Pierce pleaded that they had been discharged in bankruptcy. To this plea the plaintiff replied by supplemental petition, that if in fact Robinson and Hoskins were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ben Fitzgerald Realty Co. v. Muller, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1993
  2. Crouch v. GrayTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Denby Motor Truck Co. v. MearsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Eagle Drug Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Miller v. Presswood, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API