Legal Opinion
Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Lydia O.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 2017No. B275340PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
—Lydia O. and Jesse S., the mother and presumed father of nine-year-old Breanna S. and four-year-old David S., appeal the juvenile court’s May 17, 2016 order pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.261 terminating their parental rights and identifying adoption as the permanent plan for Breanna and David. Lydia contends the juvenile court erred in ruling she had failed to establish the parent-child relationship exception to termination of parental rights (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(l)(B)(i)). Jesse contends the court and the Los Angeles County Department of Children…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Celine R.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Cynthia D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- San Francisco Human Servs. Agency v. Christine C. (In re Caden C.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Riverside Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Soc. Servs. v. S.A. (In re N.G.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. Shawn M. (In re Elizabeth M.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. C.S. (In re A.S.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. Sally H. (In re E.H.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.