Legal Opinion

Nantz v. Employment Security Commission

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1976No. 7510SC726PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Plaintiff had no express contract of employment with the State Employment Security Commission; nor was there any applicable statutory provision affecting her job tenure or contractual rights. Under G.S. 96-4 the Director of the Commission had the power to “appoint” her to the job, to fix her compensation, and to prescribe her duties.

Plaintiff contends that her dismissal by the Commission violated her due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court of the United States has established that due process requirements apply only to deprivations of liberty and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Holly Ridge Associates, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. North Carolina Forestry Ass'n v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. Public StaffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Bishop v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Evans v. Fran-Char Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API