Legal Opinion
Bishop v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided August 21, 1990No. 898SC777PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Judge.
Respondent appellant does not question any of the foregoing facts upon which the several adjudications are based. Its only contentions are that the trial court erred in concluding that the dismissal procedures violated Bishop’s due process rights and in awarding her back pay and attorneys fees. Neither contention has merit in our opinion.
That petitioner had a property interest of continued employment which the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution protected is not disputed. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Leiphart…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Leiphart v. North Carolina School of the ArtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Nantz v. Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blalock v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Gainey v. North Carolina Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996