Inland Waterway Develop. v. City of Jacksonville
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
Eminent domain proceedings by City of Jacksonville against Inland Waterway Development Company to acquire a tract of land, wherein the Jacksonville Baseball Exhibition Company was permitted to intervene and become a party defendant. From an adverse judgment, both defendants appeal.
Affirmed. The City of Jacksonville exhibited its petition in the Circuit Court, alleging among other things that it was "vested by law with the power of eminent domain to condemn all lands necessary for its corporate purposes." The object of the petition was to acquire title by condemnation to certain lands within…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilton v. County St. JohnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Spafford v. Brevard County, FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Spafford v. Brevard CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- City of St. Louis v. MeintzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Sibley v. Volusia CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dade County v. BrighamSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Canal Authority v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- City of Ottumwa v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- City of Jacksonville v. GriffinSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Tosohatchee Game Pres. v. Central & So. Fla. Fl. CDSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.