Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Misquadace

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 2001No. C4-01-81Published

1DissentLansing, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I agree that written findings on guidelines departures help assure uniformity in sentencing, but I cannot agree that the holding of Givens is dictum that this court can disregard. Neither can I discern legislative intent to overrule Givens in the legislature’s subsequent amendment to the sentencing guidelines.

The supreme court in Givens held that a defendant may waive his right to be sentenced under the guidelines and, therefore, may agree to a departure as part of a plea agreement. 544 N.W.2d at 777. That holding resolved a recurring issue — namely, whether a plea…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Lee v. ArrowoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. In Re Estate of BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. State v. SynnesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API