Legal Opinion
Jewett v. Garrett
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided September 22, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions
At Law. Upon motions to vacate service of writ upon the defendant Robert Garrett, and to quash the writ.
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
The facts upon which these motions are based are these: In December, 1890, Mr. Bower, an attorney residing and practicing in the city of New York, and who had been duly admitted to 'practice in this court, desiring to commence an action at law at the suit of the plaintiff, William Cornell Jewett, a resident of the state of New Jersey, against the defendants, Robert Garrett, William F. Frick, and Ferdinand C. Latrobe, residents of the state of Maryland, applied to the clerk of this court for a writ of summons, according to the practice which obtains in this circuit. At the same time he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCormick Harvesting MacHine Co. v. WalthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Perkins v. WatertownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin · 1873
- Springer v. FosterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1842
- Smith v. TuttleU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1870
3Cited by5 opinions
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Concrete Steel Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- De Laet v. SeltzerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1932
- Perris Irr. Dist. v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- Puleston v. United StatesUnited States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida · 1898
- Constitutionality of Legislation to Establish a Program to Prevent Aircraft Piracy, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1973