Legal Opinion
De Laet v. Seltzer
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 13, 1932No. 5414PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
The defendant appears specially and seeks by motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction over the person of the defendant.
It appears that the action is one based on personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff arising out of the alleged negligent operation *1023of the defendant’s automobile in the Eastern District of New York.
The defendant is a resident of Pennsylvania, and was so at the time of the accident. Service was effected upon him in accordance with the provisions of section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ChattersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Smolik v. Philadelphia & Heading Coal & Iron Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
- Shushereba v. AmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. JamesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940
- Holbrook v. CafieroDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- Carby v. GrecoDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1940
- Iser v. BrockwayDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
- Blunda v. CraigDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.