Legal Opinion
Sunoco, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 26, 2004No. 02-466CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
At issue before the Court is a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment brought by the *392Defense Energy Support Center (DESC) (Defendant) and a Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment brought by Sunoco, Inc. & Puerto Rico Sun Oil Company (Plaintiffs). For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s motion regarding its claim that EPA Clause B19.33 is illegal is DENIED. Defendant’s motion regarding the contracts in which DESC received a deviation is DENIED. Defendant’s motion regarding its claim that Plaintiffs waived their right to challenge implementation…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tesoro Hawaii Corporation, Tesoro Alaska Company and Hermes Consolidated, Inc., D/B/A Wyoming Refining Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- First Commerce Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Tesoro Hawaii Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005