Hattemer v. State Tax Commission
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
Complainant is a retail dealer in' coal, and seeks a declaratory judgment of his nonliability to the payment of the privilege or license tax imposed under the provisions of the Sales Tax Revenue Act of February, 1937 (Acts 1936-1937, Special Session, p. 125), and from an adverse ruling in the court below prosecutes this appeal.
If the decision of the chancellor is to be overturned, such result must rest upon the exemption feature of the statute as found in section 4 thereof (page 128). This for the reason that undisputedly the coal sold by complainant is tangible personal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holt v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Long v. Roberts & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
3Cited by13 opinions
- Curry v. Woodstock Slag CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Camp v. MilamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- State v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Babcock v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.