Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Stevens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1914No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Cass; Des Voignes, J. Attachment by Agnes Stevens against Daniel W. Stevens for money had and received. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This action was begun by a writ of attachment issued out of the circuit court of Cass county, November 7,1912, on the strength of an affidavit made by plaintiff, alleging that:

“This deponent further says that he (she) has good reason to believe and does believe that the said Daniel W. Stevens is about to dispose of a portion of his property with intent to defraud his creditors,” etc.

Plaintiff and defendant were husband and wife, and said Daniel W. Stevens was then hopelessly demented, totally incapable of transacting any business, and under guardianship of his son, who had given a bond to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hunt v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dechter v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Graef v. KanouseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Gannon v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. People's State Bank v. FrisbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Gannon v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API