People's State Bank v. Frisbee
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Murphy, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by the People’s State Bank against Daniel D. Frisbee and Thomas E. Mitchell on certain promissory notes. There were two separate suits in which one resulted in a judgment for plaintiff and one in judgment for defendants. Both were appealed to the circuit court, and by stipulation were tried as one case. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant Frisbee brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Plaintiff commenced two suits in the justices’ court for the city of Detroit against defendants, one involving two promissory notes and the other one. In each case less than $500 was involved. Plaintiff succeeded in one of said cases and defendants in the other. Both cases were appealed to the circuit court where they were brought on for hearing at the same time, when counsel for plaintiff in open court made the following announcement:
■ “Mr. Hanley: It is agreed, by the attorneys, Keena, Lightner, Oxtoby & Hanley, for plaintiff, and Millis, Griffin, Seely & Streeter, for the defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wessels v. BeemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Bales v. EvansMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Hyman v. KirtMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Stevens v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Smith v. NixonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by1 opinion
- Berke v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1937