Legal Opinion

G. S. Suppiger Co. v. Morton Salt Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 14, 1941No. 7356PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff sued defendant for infringement of its patent No. 2,060,645, covering a “tablet depositing machine.” Both validity and infringement of said patent were denied. After defendant had taken the deposition of two of plaintiff’s officers, it moved for summary judgment, and its motion was granted, upon the ground that the testimony showed plaintiff was using its patent to secure a monopoly of a non-patented article, to-wit, salt tablets.

The District Court, taking its guidance from the holdings in American Lecithin Co. v. Warfield Co., 7 Cir., 105 F.2d 207, 212; Leitch…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Leitch Manufacturing Co. v. Barber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Bauer & Cie v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Mathews Conveyer Co. v. Palmer-Bee Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  4. Waco-Porter Corp. v. Tubular Structures Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1963
  5. Burns v. MulderDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API