Legal Opinion

Qi v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 20, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2010-0190Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) PAUL QI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-0190 (RBW) ) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ) CORPORATION, in its capacity as receiver of ) Washington Mutual Bank, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION The pro se plaintiff's complaint alleges that the defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), as receiver for Washington Mutual Bank ("WaMu"), improperly breached a lease agreement and seeks relief for damages arising from the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Meijer, Inc. v. Biovail Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. Bruce A. Howell v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Eliot Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Longwood Village Restaurant, Ltd. v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API