Legal Opinion

United States v. Scalzitti

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1975No. Crim. 74-276, 74-377PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TEITELBAUM, District Judge.

This case is presently before the Court on four motions of defendants: 1) Defendant Fanell’s motion to dismiss the indictment; 2) defendant Sealzitti’s motion to remove a restraining order; 3) defendant Sealzitti’s motion to quash the indictment; and 4) defendant Sealzitti’s motion to dismiss the first and sixteenth counts of the indictment.

A hearing will be scheduled on defendant Fanell’s motion. On January 14, 1974, Fanell, a subpoenaed witness, refused to answer questions put to him before a Western District of Pennsylvania grand jury, claiming a privilege…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. StofskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. United States v. AmatoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. FieldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. United States v. BoffaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  4. United States v. ThevisDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
  5. United States v. HarveyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API