Legal Opinion

Kregel v. Cirkler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 8, 1924No. 23,731PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover, upon the ground of fraudulent misrepresentations, the amount paid by the plaintiff for a drugstore stock and a leasehold, and to cancel the note and chattel mortgage and the mortgage on the leasehold given for the unpaid portion of the purchase price. The defendant, denying the fraud, asked the foreclosure of the chattel mortgage and the mortgage on the leasehold. Certain issues were submitted to a jury. There were findings against the plaintiff, and a decree for foreclosure of the chattel mortgage *177and the mortgage on the leasehold. The plaintiff appeals from the order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thaden v. BaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Rosenberger v. H. E. Wilcox Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Vernon Shell Road Co. v. MayorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Knopfler v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Polchow v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Dix v. Harris Machinery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Wentz v. Guaranteed Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Wilson v. LynardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API