Legal Opinion

Wholesale Petroleum Company v. Chartin

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1998No. 90,180PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by

CAROL M. HANSEN, J.

' ¶ 1 Appellants, Mary Sue Chartin and Angel Chartin (Chartins), seek review of the trial court’s judgment quieting title to certain real property in Appellee, Wholesale Petroleum Company (Wholesale). The trial court correctly held a resale tax deed issued to Chartins was void for lack of proper notice and we affirm.

¶ 2 The facts are not in controversy. The real property in contention, Lot 32, Block 5, Burnett’s Refinery Addition to the City of Sapulpa, was first acquired by Wholesale in 1974. Lot 32 is in the middle of eight other lots which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Luster v. Bank of ChelseaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. McGrath v. EichoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Terwilleger v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Unit Petroleum Co. v. Nuex Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Carlile v. CarlileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. MayberryCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  2. TIP Properties, L.L.C. v. HarrisonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API