Legal Opinion

Hartselle v. Hartselle

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 8, 1985No. Civ. 4678PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a divorce case.

After an ore tenus hearing, the trial court divorced the parties, awarded primary custody of the two minor children to the husband, and made a division of property.

The wife appeals, contending that the trial court erred in the custody award and in the division of property. We find no error requiring reversal and affirm.

We deem it neither necessary nor prudent to set out in detail the facts of this appeal. Viewing the record with the attendant presumptions accorded the trial court's action, the following facts are sufficient.

After a nine and one-half year marriage, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DevineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Eubanks v. EubanksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  3. Linderman v. LindermanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  4. Marr v. MarrCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  5. Austin v. AustinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Jacobs v. JacobsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Vandiver v. VandiverCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Graham v. GrahamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. Hutchinson v. HutchinsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API