Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Rutko

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 29, 1993No. ACMR 9101712PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CREAN, Senior Judge:

The appellant, on mixed pleas, was found guilty, by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members, of violating a general regulation by wrongfully fraternizing with lower ranking soldiers, maltreatment of soldiers under his authority, three specifications of sodomy, one by force and without consent, and three specifications of indecent acts, two to satisfy his lust and sexual desire and the other by encouraging, forcing, and directing the sexual act, in violation of Articles 92, 93, 125, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice 10…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. HansonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  2. United States v. GoddardNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  3. United States v. HarrisArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. SojferNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  5. United States v. CarsonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API