Legal Opinion

Womack v. Von Rardon

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 25, 2006No. 24221-8-IIIPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*257¶1 Bernadette Womack received a $5,000 general damages award for emotional distress in a default judgment against Rusty Rardon, his parents, and Jayson Anderson due to the malicious burning of her cat, Max, and her son’s harassment. Ms. Womack appeals unopposed, contending the trial court improperly measured her damages and dismissed her private nuisance, outrage, and statutory waste claims. The Animal Legal Defense Fund, amicus, joins in the measure of damages claim. We affirm except for the judgment interest rate and, in doing so, hold a new action and remedy for malicious injury to a pet…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kloepfel v. BokorWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Kloepfel v. BokorWashington Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Plotnik v. MeihausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Strong v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Strong v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Womack v. Von RardonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Sherman v. KissingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API