Legal Opinion

Fassilis v. Esperdy

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 2, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion, in behalf of the defendant, for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. Defendant also moves, under Rule 30(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, to vacate the plaintiff’s notice to take the deposition of the defendant.

This action was commenced on October 24, 1960, under Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.A. § 1009) and Section 279 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.A. § 1329), to review the decision of the Attorney…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Ziffrin, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States Ex Rel. Weddeke v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fassilis v. EsperdyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Fassilis v. EsperdyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Manarolakis v. CoomeyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
  4. BARRIOSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API