Legal Opinion

Summers v. Automobile Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1930No. 27225PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Carter, District Judge.

This is an action brought in the county court of Garfield county, Nebraska, to recover damages for loss of crops under the terms of a hail insurance policy. The answer admitted the contract of insurance, but alleged that it contained a provision that the company was not liable unless sworn proof of loss should be furnished the company within 60 days after the- loss, setting forth specific information relative to the loss, and that said proof had not been furnished as required by the policy. No reply was filed. A trial was had, judgment awarded plaintiff, and an appeal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Livesey v. Omaha Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  2. O'Leary v. IskeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Cobbey v. BuchananNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Darner v. DaggettNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Mordhorst v. Nebraska Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Klanecky v. Woodmen of the WorldNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API