Legal Opinion
Mordhorst v. Nebraska Telephone Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1890PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Error to the district court for Gage county. Tried below before Broady, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This was a suit brought by defendant in error against the plaintiff in error upon a written contract for the rental of a telephone. This contract is made a part of the petition, and contains among other provisions the following:
“In case communication is interrupted from any cause whatever, the only liability of the exchange shall be to abate the rent during such interruption, after twenty-four hours’ written notice thereof to-the Exchange. * * *
“ The subscriber requests the Nebraska Telephone Company to place in his premises one set of telephone instruments, as noted on the back hereof, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mathews v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Jones v. Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cady v. South Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Gran v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Barr v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Jacobs v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Madson v. RuttenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.