Legal Opinion

McKinley v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 18, 1937No. Gen. No. 39,311PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

Plaintiffs McKinley and Heller were associate judges of the municipal court of Chicago. They sued to recover portions of their salaries alleged to be unpaid. The complaint in each case contained three counts. The first claimed for the salary of the office during the period of time when it was, in fact, occupied by another. The second count claimed on account of unexpended appropriations for the judges of the municipal court, specifically mentioning vacancies due to deaths and resignations, which resulted in such unexpended appropriations. The third count was similar to the second with the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Dolan v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Kreitz v. BehrensmeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Board of Auditors v. BenoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKinley v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API