Brouwer v. Pacicca
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from stated portions of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (DiFiore, J.), entered January 17, 2001, on consent.
*449Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
Where, as here, an order indicates on its face that it was made on consent, it is not appealable (see, Matter of Garcia v Carballo, 277 AD2d 453; Matter of Chiakpo v Obi, 255 AD2d 579; Matter of Hartnett v Hartnett, 242 AD2d 535; Matter of Larkin-King v King, 159 AD2d 626; CPLR…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garcia v. CarballoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Chiakpo v. ObiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Hartnett v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Nayman v. Remsen Apartments, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Larkin-King v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reilly v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Strang v. RathboneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Husak v. 45th Avenue Housing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Martinez v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Shifer v. ShiferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.