Legal Opinion

Chiakpo v. Obi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 30, 1998PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated July 16, 1996, as granted the father’s petition for sole custody of the parties’ child, determined that the father was entitled to attorney’s fees, and directed a hearing to determine the amount of attorney’s fees.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

*580Following the custody hearing, the mother consented to the father’s petition for sole custody. No appeal lies from an order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lockett S. v. Onya S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Breiterman v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Charles v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. 6 Davis Associates, Inc. v. Rye Castle Apartment Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hochhauser v. Electric InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Brouwer v. PaciccaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. McKiernan v. McKiernanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Garcia v. CarballoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Cooper v. Administration for Children's ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API