Legal Opinion
Flores v. Von Kleist
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 10, 2010No. 2:08-cv-02499PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., District Judge.
Defendants Jack Martin, Mark Hendry, Leigh McDaniels, Ben Kraemer and Vangie Porras (collectively, the “School Board Defendants”) filed a motion for summary judgment on April 16, 2010, on Plaintiffs federal and state claims alleged in his second amended complaint. (Docket No. 29.) Defendant Chris Von Kleist also filed a motion for summary judgment on April 16, 2010. (Docket No. 27.) Each Defendant’s motion asserts the qualified immunity defense to certain of Plaintiffs federal…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duffer v. United Continental Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Stampfli v. Susanville Sanitary DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023