Legal Opinion
Vaughan v. Graves
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 18, 2012No. 110,622PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLBERT, V.C.J.
T1 This matter raises a first impression question concerning whether proceedings in aid of execution, or judgment collection that are pursued within an action brought pursu*625ant to the Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act (UFTA), Okla. Stat. tit. 24, §§ 112-123 (2011), must be preceded by registration of a foreign judgment in the county of the district court from which execution issues. This Court holds that registration of a foreign judgment is a jurisdictional prerequisite to execution and judgment collection remedies.
Facts and Procedural History
I 2 In 1995, Henry Dean Vaughan, a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Burrows v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Heiman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Valley Vista Development Corp. v. City of Broken ArrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Gray v. State ex rel. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 12 v. STATESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
- Bank of Am., N.A. v. DasovichCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- BANK OF AMERICA v. DASOVICHCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- PGA West Residential Assn. v. Hulven InternationalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.