Legal Opinion
City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Employment Relations Board Ex Rel. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees Ass'n, Local 2384
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 2, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 6808PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEYERSON, Presiding Judge.
The central issue in this appeal concerns the collective bargaining obligations imposed upon the City of Phoenix and its public employee representatives under the City’s “meet and confer” ordinance. For the reasons hereafter stated, we affirm the ruling of the trial court which held that the City committed an unfair labor practice by agreeing, prior to any negotiations, to be bound by voluntary federal wage and price guidelines. The facts forming the background of this dispute can best be understood by first reviewing the City’s meet and confer ordinance.
I. THE MEET…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents' International UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kaleva-Norman-Dickson School District No. 6 v. Kalevanorman-Dickson School Teachers' Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Pasco Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Florida Public Emp. Rel. Comm.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bighorn BeverageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Employment Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006