Stoker v. Stoker
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[¶ 1] The appellant, Jim W. Stoker (the husband), and the appellee, Tina Stoker (the wife), were married in 1995 and divorced in 2002. In the divorce proceeding, the district court awarded the wife a judgment equivalent to one-half of the appraised value of real property known as the “dry farm.” On appeal, the husband essentially argues that the district court failed adequately to consider all of the factors listed in Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-114 (LexisNexis 2003) in disposing of the dry farm property. We find that the district court did adequately consider these factors, and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Grosskopf v. GrosskopfWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Carlton v. CarltonWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Metz v. MetzWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Young v. YoungWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Andrew P. Johnson v. Katie L. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Montoya v. Navarette-MontoyaWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- DeJohn v. DeJohnWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Megan E. Vassilopoulos v. Kyle S. VassilopoulosWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
- Guy Morrison, Iii v. Tami Hinson-MorrisonWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.