Legal Opinion

People v. Thames

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 23, 2015No. Supreme Court Case 14SA312PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

of the Court.

T1 This interlocutory appeal challenges the trial court's order suppressing statements made by Douglas Thames, the defendant, during custodial interrogation. Investigators gave Thames an oral Miranda advisement, Thames confirmed that he understood his Miranda rights, and he signed a written waiver form before making statements the prosecution wishes to use in its case-in-chief, Relying on the defense's expert witness who testified that Thames had difficulty understanding spoken paragraphs concerning abstract ideas, the trial court concluded that he did not knowingly and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. People v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. People v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  2. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Asha Adolphus THOMPSONSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  3. v. ThamesColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. People v. BondsteelColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. People v. Bruce E. BagwellColorado Court of Appeals · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API