Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Shostak

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 2013No. ED 98219PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA L. COHEN, Judge.

Introduction

Dr. Mark R. Rosenberg (Plaintiff) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting summary judgment in favor of Burton H. Shostak and his former law firm, Moline & Mehan, LLC (the Firm) (collectively, Defendants), on Plaintiffs petition for legal malpractice. Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment because: (1) genuine issues of material fact remain in dispute; (2) the statute of limitations did not bar Plaintiffs claim; (3) neither Plaintiffs criminal conviction, the denial of…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Bradshaw v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Joseph Gelb v. Royal Globe Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dalton Trigg v. Steven Farese, Sr.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Juan v. GroweMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Thomas v. HillyardUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  4. John Doe, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Missouri State Highway Patrol Criminal Records Repository, and City of University CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Fahey v. CookNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API