Legal Opinion

Mack v. Passaic Nat. Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 12, 1946No. 9075PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Following our decision in this case, reported 3 Cir., 150 F.2d 474, and the dispatch of our mandate, the court below permitted the appellant, Kurzrok, “* * * to intervene in this action for the sole purpose of protecting his rights as a lot owner of West Ridgelawn Cemetery and the rights of the members of his class in this cause * * - * ” and giving him a stated time in which to file pleadings. Kurzrok, who appears pro se, has appealed from this order. Apparently misunderstanding the nature of the intervention allowed him, he asserts that the court -below improperly limited it in the light of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mack v. Passaic Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mack v. Passaic National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1955
  2. Mack v. Passaic National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  3. Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Ruth P. Mack v. Passaic National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API