Legal Opinion

Memphis & L. R. R. v. Dow

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided February 11, 1884PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

The complainant’s hill is filed against the trustees and holders of the mortgage bonds of the complainant for $2,600,-00Ú, and the mortgage upon its corporate franchises and property for securing the same, executed May 2,1877, seeking to annul the bonds and mortgage, upon the ground that they wore issued and executed by the complainant without corporate power in that behalf.

A brief statement of tho facts relating to the creation of the mortgage bonds, their origin, consideration, and purpose, will serve to present the legal questions involved. The complainant, created under a spec'al act of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Whitney Arms Co. v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Gold-Mining Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Parish v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boonville National Bank v. SchlotzhauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Wittmer Lumber Co. v. RiceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. In re Waterloo Organ Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  4. Marion Trust Co. v. Crescent Loan & Investment Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. In re New York Car Wheel WorksDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API