Legal Opinion

Smith v. Doe

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 24, 1988No. 76634PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

The issue to be resolved in this case is whether a plaintiff can maintain in a single lawsuit a John Doe action against an unknown hit-and-run driver and, in the alternative, an action against a named person whom the plaintiff accuses of being the tortfeasor. We answer the question in the affirmative and reverse the judgment below.

The collision out of which this action arose occurred while appellant was sitting in the back seat of a car in front of his home. Another car collided with the one in which appellant sat, injuring him. Appellant did not see who was driving the other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Moss v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Mundt v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lipscomb v. DoeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Walker v. Jack Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Kannady v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Lunceford v. Peachtree Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Ditch v. Royal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API