Legal Opinion

Mundt v. Olson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 2, 1980No. 59206PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

This appeal arises from the grant of a motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion because appellant’s pro se responses to certain requests for admission were unsworn. We reverse.

Recognizing that the Civil Practice Act does not require responses to requests for admission to be made under oath (see Cable Masters, Inc. v. Shaw, 151 Ga. App. 153 (259 SE2d 157) (1979)), appellee asserts that the summary judgment is nonetheless proper since appellant failed to file a copy of his responses with the trial court as required by CPA § 5(d) (Code Ann. § 81A-105 (d)).

Timel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cable Masters, Inc. v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Herringdine v. Nalley Equipment Leasing Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Smith v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Harvey v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Jeffrey S. Leeper v. Safebuilt Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  5. Vanderbreggen v. HodgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API