Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

United States District Court

Decided August 15, 2018No. Civil No. 17-3495(RBK/JS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOEL SCHNEIDER, United States Magistrate Judge

This matter is before the Court on the "Motion to Withdraw" ("motion") [Doc. No. 6]1 filed by plaintiff's counsel, Thomas Cartmell, Esquire, Jeffrey Kuntz, Esquire, and David DeGreeff, Esquire, on behalf of their law firm Wagstaff & Cartmell, LLP (hereinafter collectively referred to as "counsel"). No opposition to the motion has *430been filed. The Court recently held oral argument. Counsel seeks to withdraw because the case is too expensive now that his client has chosen to litigate rather than settle. For the reasons to be discussed, counsel's…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. LoBiondo v. SchwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  3. Kriegsman v. KriegsmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Rusinow v. KamaraDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Denise Williams v. Township of Cherry Hill, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
  2. Farr v. Northrup QuarryDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. MULLINS v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  4. SHAH v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  5. SWIFT v. PANDEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API